Archive for July, 2009

London!

Posted in Uncategorized on July 25, 2009 by sojournerphoto

London-2

London again

Posted in Uncategorized on July 25, 2009 by sojournerphoto

London-3

London again

Posted in Uncategorized on July 25, 2009 by sojournerphoto

London-4

London visit

Posted in Uncategorized on July 24, 2009 by sojournerphoto

London-5

Other site

Posted in Art, Zoneplate on July 24, 2009 by sojournerphoto

Zone Plate (3 of 2)

My other site will be taken down shortly. Part of the reason for this is that I want to change the direction of my (few!) print sales and one of the keys is that I don’t want to keep producing the same pictures over, but move on to new work. I am considering just printing one print for each picture I work on and then if some wishes to buy it that’s great – they will have a unique photograph – if not then I will have a unique photograph. I’m no sure about this yet and may adopt different apporaches at different times, but certainly I want to change the way things are presented and the end of the sites life is a good opportunity to achieve this.

Mike

Zoneplate image

Posted in Art, Zoneplate on July 24, 2009 by sojournerphoto

Zone Plate (3 of 1)

Washing drying

Documenting today

Posted in Art, Zoneplate on July 24, 2009 by sojournerphoto

20090720 TMax3200 Zoneplate and Megan Pinhole experiments14mgs

I commented on Colin Jago’s blog the other day on the possible inappropriateness of using film – or my thoughts are more specifically about specifically 35mm black and white film – to document the world today. Although I haven’t settled this yet, my thoughts were triggered by the launch of the Olympus EP-1, which I thought might be a perfect camera for a coupl of documentary projects I have in mind. Now having tried one briefly I’m not so sure, but some things have crossed my mind as I think about the project ideas:

– Our view of earlier times is very strongly coloured (sorry) by the nature of any images and particularly photographs that remain from those eras. Up until the 50s the world was grainy and black and white – see Robert Franks ‘The Americans’. The 70s are said to have been the Kodachrome era, again the look dates the era and inflences our view the world then.

– Although film has changed and improved, grain remains. If I use film to document lives aorund me now, it immediately takes the viewer back in time when they view prints. If I use black and white, again there is a message about the era and subject, reflecting the way black and white film has beenn used.

– Our view of now is influenced by images of the world as well as the world itself, and most of these images are digital. Many in fact are never even seen on paper, but on screens. If we want people to see what we see as contemporary, and people in the future to see us as we see ourselves, we need to use images that are consistent with this. If we choose not to use digital images then we are in danger of presenting a view of our world that will be interpreted as being from an earlier time. Two of my potential projects, being centred on the lives of an allotment association and a church, could very easily be turned into something that appears to come, nostalgically, from the past rather than being about the lives of people now.

These are just a  few thoughts, and may not stop me using some film at least for the projects. At the very least, though, they act as a warning to consider very carefully how the medium will impact on the message. A couple of examples that spring to mind are the work of James Ravilious and Kate Bellis. Kate Bellis’ project, ‘Gathering‘, in particular was undertaken at a time when digital was a viable alternative to film. Yet both of these photographers were documenting old ways of life that appear, from the outside at least, to be under threat. Again, this has become a part of 35mm black and white films message.

Some thoughts for contemplation.

Mike